She is beautiful.

But when will you finally realize that this is a LONG hair forum? Long hair even by very common definition (not by the standards of us diehard long hair admirers who dream of knee, calf or even floor lengths) means at least a good deal below shoulder length.

Why didn´t you just leave out the dozens of pictures where her hair barely touches her shoulders?

Will your standard for long hair to be posted here one day be "gorgeous hair in earlobe length"?

There are pictures in this bunch where Natalie Portman does have long hair. Concentrate on these and forget about the rest, at least for our sakes. A ponytail that does not even reach armpit length? Here on this forum? Now, come on!