I don't want to get into this again, but I do want to say a few things.

1. I don't post every single celebrity out there with long hair and I don't intend to either. I don't make celebrity posts every day and I wouldn't want to either. I like posting celebrities that I think have beautiful hair in general. I also like posting celebrities that have taken part in shampoo commercials. Clearly there is love for these women or else these shampoo companies wouldn't hire them to endorse their product and magazines wouldn't praise their hair. Also, the women that I post don't all have the same length. I've posted women that have had hair down to their breasts and mid-back in addition to shoulder-length and upper back.

2. Everyone has their own definition of long hair and I think there shouldn't be a specific one for a place like this. Who are any of you to decide what the length is for long hair for a place like this should be? I'm not deciding this for myself or for any of you. I'm not stopping you from posting your own long hair stuff. Long hair should not be defined as hair that only goes down to a woman's mid-back, ass, calves, feet, etc. Hair has been and should still consider to be long if it just goes down to her shoulders or upper back in addition to going down to mid-back, ass, calves, etc. It's been that way for long hair companies like Pantene, Head & Shoulders, etc for decades. Why does long hair have to be just one specific length to so many of you? Why can't you enjoy long hair that is shorter down to shoulders or upper back as well as long hair that goes down to mid-back, ass, calves, etc. There are plenty of men and women out there that like shorter long hair as well as long hair that is extremely long.

Besides, what's wrong with some long hair variety in a place like this? I do enjoy long hair that goes down to a woman's mid-back, ass, calves, etc just like the rest of you. I really do. I'd love to be with someone that has extremely long hair just like the rest of you would ideally want to be with. However, and forgive me for saying this, but it's unlikely many of us are going to be married or dating a woman that has extremely long hair down to their ass, calves, feet, etc. Sure, there are women like that out there and I'm glad there are just like the rest of you are, but it's not like you see women with hair like that walking down the street each day. Go to a dating website and let's see you find lots of women that have long hair down to their ass, feet, calves, etc. You'll likely find just a handful.

3. I don't see why you can't enjoy a woman's hair if it only goes down to her shoulders or upper back. That kind of hair can still be beautiful, soft, silky, sexy, etc. and you can still get a great hairjob from that kind of hair.

4. If these female celebrities are good enough for companies like Pantene, Head & Shoulders, etc., then why can't they be good enough for you? OK, so it's not as long as a woman's mid-back, ass, calves, feet, etc. But why does that mean to you all that it's not beautiful, desirable and enjoyable?

5. If you don't like my posts, DON'T CLICK ON THEM. Nobody is forcing you to.